Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Lag: again
Stop touching whatever in that inventory stuff, at each patch you add more lag, not thank you for this. Can I get back my money for all the time I can't play or wasted behind the screen trying to play "Lag-On-Line" ?
Seriously, try to play on TQ some day, or should we move on to china/japan server?
Sorry to state that but...
China Server is down since a while. Thats why CCP added language support for chinese players so they have to play on tranquility.
Dennie Fleetfoot wrote:So I was at the Newcastle meet last night.
...
They know they screwed up with the UI. And they are determined to get it fixed and don't care how much dev time it takes away from other things to do so. And I believed them. They have to. They know players are unhappy with it and they have the data to show it, feedback like the forums, petitions, bug reports and feedback from un-subbing players.
The old UI is NOT coming back or being rolled back. It is genuinely impossible to do so as so much other cool stuff in Inferno is built upon it. There was some other stuff mentioned about UI development which for the reasons I've already said I'm not going to repeat here. But I'm now confident that UI will be a suitable replacement for what we had before. It's just a matter of how long it will take.
...
An example from the history of EVE Online:
The "new shiny" ingame jukebox with added playlist support (introduced with "Dominion" in December 2009)
was not working for me for more than 18 months since it hit TQ in unfinished/untested state until it was fixed silent without any further comment on the patchnotes in July 2011 (Incarna).
And as a personal sidenote from me:
The inventory is a way more important(!) part of the game and the new GUI is still in beta state. A huge drop in FPS with every
opened window. And multi boxing is a mess in the current state. And at this point i dont talk about the Unified Inventory, i point at the whole
Graphical User Interface.
The buggy Jukebox in the past could easily be bypassed with OOG use of WinAmp. And now try to find a workaround for the laggy/buggy new GUI... There is none!
Conclusion:
Its a shame for CCP to replace working stuff with new code that wasn't ready to release and untested from QA. Also there was no deadline to push it on TQ!
Also i am not willing to pay a subscription for all of my 4 active accounts for more than one year (more than Gé¼500) until the devs getting this mess fixed and working. Sorry...
